Review of the Past Week

Review of the Past Week

In the ever-evolving world of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) regulations, 2025 presents a complex and rapidly changing landscape. This article offers an insightful look into the current ESG regulatory status across key regions - the European Union (EU), the United States (U.S.), and Australia.

The EU, a strong political leader in ESG regulation, continues to expand its sustainability and human rights laws, simultaneously simplifying some requirements for companies. The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) are key pillars being restructured and streamlined under the EU's Omnibus initiative, which delays some obligations for non-EU companies and eases compliance particularly for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and multinational firms. The EU has also introduced the ESG Regulation on Rating Activities (ESGR), establishing the first EU-wide ESG rating rules covering transparency, governance, and supervision. New regulations on human rights issues, like a proposal to ban forced labor in supply chains, reflect the EU's growing scope beyond environmental issues alone.

Australia, while not providing explicit updates on its ESG regulatory initiatives in Q2 2025, typically aligns with international ESG developments and is influenced by global sustainability frameworks and market expectations. Its ESG regulatory environment is likely adapting to the same global shifts in reporting and disclosure seen globally, including pressures to conform to International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) standards. Emerging markets, especially in Asia including Australia, are noted as becoming regulatory first movers in ESG.

The U.S. shows a growing divide between federal and state-level ESG regulations and a more cautious federal stance compared to the EU. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) initially adopted a landmark climate disclosure rule in early 2024 but has since withdrawn federal climate disclosure requirements under the current administration. Instead, key states like California have advanced their own mandatory climate reporting laws, creating a patchwork of obligations. Large asset managers have retreated from collaborative ESG initiatives, reflecting legal and political pressures. U.S. political efforts are underway to limit the extraterritorial effects of EU ESG regulations on American companies.

Globally, the ISSB introduced its first global baseline sustainability disclosure standards (IFRS S1 and S2) in January 2024, aiming to converge voluntary frameworks globally, though adoption and alignment remain uneven across jurisdictions. Emerging markets in Asia and the Middle East are positioning themselves as regulatory pioneers in ESG, introducing mandates faster than some established jurisdictions. Investors face challenges in assessing compliance and readiness due to fragmented regulatory systems and diverging simplification efforts worldwide.

This overview reflects the dynamic, widely varied ESG regulatory environment companies and investors must navigate in mid-2025. The landscape is marked by a mix of advancing regulatory frameworks and some regulatory simplifications, as well as a growing divide between regions in their approach to ESG regulation.

1. In the realm of sustainable finance, the European Union (EU) is leading the charge, continually evolving its sustainability and human rights laws, and simplifying some requirements for companies.
2. The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) are key pillars being restructured under the EU's Omnibus initiative, offering relief for non-EU companies and SMEs.
3. The EU has also established the first EU-wide ESG rating rules covering transparency, governance, and supervision through the ESG Regulation on Rating Activities (ESGR).
4. Moving forward, the EU is addressing human rights issues, such as a proposal to ban forced labor in supply chains, expanding its focus beyond environmental concerns.
5. While Australia has yet to issue explicit updates on its ESG regulatory initiatives in Q2 2025, it is expected to adapt to global sustainability frameworks and market expectations.
6. The United States (U.S.) shows a growing divide between federal and state-level ESG regulations, with states like California advancing their own mandatory climate reporting laws, creating a patchwork of obligations.
7. On a global scale, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) introduced global baseline sustainability disclosure standards (IFRS S1 and S2) in early 2024, aiming for convergence of voluntary frameworks worldwide.
8. Emerging markets in Asia and the Middle East are positioning themselves as regulatory pioneers in ESG, introducing mandates faster than some established jurisdictions, thereby posing challenges for investors in assessing compliance and readiness in the dynamic and varied ESG regulatory environment.

Read also: